FeedHome > Articles > Plant InSites
Voices: Plant InSites
Don’t stack the deck against yourself
Always consider future expansions before finalizing layouts
ChemicalProcessing.com
By Andrew Sloley, contributing editor
A plant wanted to raise the temperature in a reactor. The new reaction conditions would push the six existing small feed/effluent heat exchangers beyond their operating temperature limit. So, the plant ordered four new exchangers, and planned to add two more later to allow removing the six original exchangers when their bundles reached their replacement point due to corrosion and erosion.
The proposed configuration for the four new exchangers had them assembled as a four pack (2 × 2) in series. The two future exchangers were going to be added on a separate foundation to make six exchangers in series (2 × 2 followed by 1 × 2). This required using space currently occupied by an air-fin exchanger that was slated for demolition as a part of a different project.
During project development the question “Are you sure that the air-fins are going to be removed?” arose as a stray thought during a review meeting. Checking revealed that the air-fin exchanger had a better than 50% probability of remaining in service. The immediate response was “Just design the new four pack to have two new shells on top.”
Redesigning the equipment and foundation to accommodate the addition of the future exchangers on the top of the stack, converting it from 2 × 2 to 2 × 3, seemed the obvious solution. However, that means the future exchangers would be inserted either into the middle of the sequence or at each end of the set of four. For heat recovery, putting the two shells in the middle is preferred. This optimizes the heat transfer by maximizing the overall exchanger corrected temperature difference. Additionally, the piping modifications are simple: the pipe segments connecting the exchanger banks are simply unbolted and re-used as-is. However, there’s a downside. Both new exchangers would handle relatively high temperatures. Putting one of the future exchangers at the cold end of the sequence reduces the mechanical design and materials severity of its service — saving up to $100,000.
However, by rethinking the layout the plant was able to double the savings. Switching to a current installation of a 1 × 1 followed by a 1 × 3 assembly allows both future exchangers to use the less expensive specification. Getting this configuration requires moving one of the existing shells from the bottom of the first stack to the bottom of the second stack and rotating it 180°. To minimize the amount of high-alloy piping the hot end of the exchangers was set as high as possible.
As this episode illustrates, even apparently obvious and easy configuration changes demand careful thought — particularly when expansion is likely. Proper pre-planning often can make future work dramatically cheaper and easier.
More Voices
Don’t stack the deck against yourself
03/14/2008
Always consider future expansions before finalizing layouts
Keep parallel pumps in line
02/13/2008
Mind the curves when using different size pumps.
Carefully check vendor references
10/30/2007
Determine the differences between a cited installation and yours, Andrew Sloley, contributing editor, says in this month's Plant InSites column.
Do some heavy thinking about light loads
10/01/2007
Cutting steam demand can get you into hot water, advises Contributing Editor Andrew W. Sloley, contributing editor, in this month's Plant InSites column.
Correct those disturbing lapses
08/31/2007
Keeping liquid in a reflux drum still can prevent problems, says Andrew Sloley, in this month's Plant InSites column.
Don’t look at precondensers in a vacuum
08/20/2007
Consider the impact of the downstream vacuum ejector on precondenser performance, advises Andrew Sloley, in this month's Plant InSites column.
Properly protect centrifugal pumps
07/11/2007
Consider various factors when selecting how to guard against low flow, Andrew Sloley says in this month's Plant Insites column.
Teaming two solutions can be counterproductive
06/06/2007
Sometimes things just don’t add up as expected. Andrew Sloley discusses how sometimes two solutions aren't always better than one solution.
Keep others from making “classic” mistakes
04/24/2007
A heat exchanger problem provides a textbook example of design limitations, according to Contributing Editor Andrew Sloley.
Don’t let parallel pumps cross you up
03/28/2007
Small differences with parallel pumps can lead to big difficulties, according to Andrew Sloley in this month's Plant InSites column.
Make sure you’ve got a good flange match
03/06/2007
Standard large-diameter flanges don’t necessarily mate. Andrew Sloley provides insight in this month's Plant Insites column.
Take the pressure off pressure control
02/19/2007
Linkage of other variables can stymie hot vapor bypass schemes, according to Andrew Sloley's Plant InSites column.
Understand and control hot vapor bypass
01/08/2007
Contributing Editor Andrew Sloley says pressure control technique works well if implemented properly, in this month's Plant InSites column.
Make jacketing your strong suit
12/05/2006
Small details in jacketed-pipe configuration can have a big impact, according to Chemical Processing's Contributing Editor Andrew Sloley.
Column configuration can cripple performance
09/21/2006
The importance of having the inherent capability to meet operating requirements and enable proper instrumentation performance is stressed by Contributing Editor Andrew Sloley.
Heat integration steps can present control problems
09/13/2006
The more energy prices rise, the more heat integration saves. However, heat integration steps can present complex control problems. Slip-ups in putting control systems in place can make operations nearly impossible. That certainly was the case at one unit using heat recovery.
Spot problems with adsorbents
08/14/2006
The longer-than-expected life of an adsorbent points up the need to always assess the consequences of system additions. While sometimes this may involve detailed calculations, simply looking to the laws of physics can eliminate potential headaches.
Keep a steady eye on measurements
06/19/2006
While engineers often strive to keep processes running without too much variation, measurements that don’t change may be a cause for concern not celebration, as one refinery can attest.
Find the real cause of pump gas up
04/17/2006
Simply blaming high feed temperature for inadequate suction isn’t enough when diagnosing pump problems. Read this article to get a laundry list of causes for pump gas up.
Keep measurements on the level
04/17/2006
Changes in liquid densities can throw off readings. Plants commonly rely on differential pressure (DP) cells to measure level. Read this month's Plant InSites for advice on how to solve these level problems.
Can you trust your sight glasses?
02/17/2006
Sight glasses are invaluable for troubleshooting towers and checking instruments. Improper connections can take a toll on accuracy.
Is achieving design conditions realistic?
08/29/2005
Many factors can influence how equipment should be operated.
Process Engineering: Inspect with your mind, not just your eyes
03/11/2005
A thorough inspection of plant equipment following tiny installations can prevent a lot of future problems. Go beyond just checking for compliance with drawings when looking at hardware and physically look at the equipment itself.
Process Engineering: Poor compressor design puts pressure on pumps
01/18/2005
When a poor compressor design put too much pressure on the pumps, a new solution had to be constructed. Sometimes the ideal solution is just an intricate compromise.
Save a bundle solving pressure-drop problems
11/04/2004
Pressure drop in compressor-suction and interstage coolers often creates problems. In some cases, just a few pounds of extra pressure drop make a revamp unworkable.
Give gaskets a squeeze
09/16/2004
Reevaluate gasket use when operating conditions or maintenance procedures change.
Sidestep side-draw control surprises
07/01/2004
The simplest approach to control side-draw distillation columns uses flow control on the side product. This solution, however, is not ideal for all side-draw control situations.
Preheater points out the value of cooling off
05/12/2004
Lack of attention to detail in conceptual design can hide many sins. Put the problem aside and then ponder it again. A fresh look may lead to an even better solution.
Tackle Tough Services for Centrifugal Pumps with Care
03/11/2004
Don’;t Let Heater Control Get You Steamed
03/03/2004