Recommended Centrifuge Controls
Figure 1. Reader suggests considering these “must have” (red) and “nice-to-have” (blue) controls for disk-stack centrifuge.
There are two categories of measurement: those for reliability and those for performance. For reliability, you should watch oil pressure, vibration, speed, bearing performance and, certainly, the oil temperature. For performance, measure the mass flow rates of the feed and the mother liquor. You can determine the flow rates of the concentrate, i.e., the heavy stream, if enough liquid is left in it.
Otherwise, the flow meter may foul too much to be useful. It is better to measure the two liquid streams and do a material balance for the heavies. One approach might be to put the heavies in a tank with a weigh cell and have the software do the material balance. This all can be automated in your control system.
One of the greatest risks to a centrifuge is ramping up and ramping down. In particular, the machine is most at risk during a sudden power failure. It’s a good idea to put the centrifuge controls on a separate controller with a dedicated uninterruptible power supply (UPS) as noted on the figure.
You also should set up supervisor-level security on the programming to prevent tampering. Because a whirling piece of steel could leave a Tasmanian-devil-size disaster if an accident occurred, I recommend putting the centrifuge under the strictest control: rigorous management of change (MOC) procedure; lock out/tag out (LOTO); and annual inspections of mechanical, foundation and electrical.
As for machine performance, I suggest Coriolis mass flow meters because they can provide density, mass flow rate, and volumetric flow rate and are built for pharmaceutical service. Just be careful how you install the meters! Put them in vertical lines that can drain; keep the transmitters remote so they aren’t affected by temperature when you clean-in-place (CIP) the tube.
Although not commonly done, you may want to automatically calculate the material balance using a process controller. Don’t count on cost savings from reducing labor with controls; the downtime alone will kill your budget while your expensive instrument techs figure out what’s wrong.
As for CIP, make sure you keep the first flush below the temperature of concern for product quality; burnt material tends to find its way into the product. This concern also is important regarding pH.
Your mention of “upstream factors” has me concerned. You may need to adjust feed stream density on-the-fly. If you haven’t already, install a feed tank upstream of the centrifuge where you can sample the density or even measure it directly and then, if needed, adjust the density of the feed with water. Take care that the feed tank is well-mixed for good sampling.
Dirk Willard, consultant
Wooster, Ohio
February’s Puzzler
We are re-tasking a batch fluid-bed dryer we had used for a different pharmaceutical product that has become a generic. I have several concerns: 1) the old particle size was larger than that of the new one which has a slightly higher density; 2) the new powder could be a fire risk — we don’t have safety data but still are pushing ahead with the project; 3) we only have incomplete maintenance data on the blower; 4) the screen and baghouse are severely corroded; 5) the electric heater leaks tramp air; and 6) the exhaust fan has been upsized twice and also is corroded.
If this dryer were a fish, I’d throw it back. Instead, I am tasked with getting this dryer up and running in three months. Because of the pandemic bottleneck, I’m not sure there’s anything I can do to make it run better.
In the future, I want to get a handle on these problems. The corrosion has me concerned. Another problem I notice is vibration in the corroded ductwork and poorly supported conduit — it jerks about an inch every time the blower starts and stops. I want to check out the fluidization against a Clark chart because I have heard of clumping complaints about the previous product.
What can I do to ensure this product campaign goes well? What do you think causes the corrosion? Why do you think the exhaust fan size was increased? Should I be concerned about preparing this dryer for use before the safety data are in?
Send us your comments, suggestions or solutions for this question by January 7, 2022. We’ll include as many of them as possible in the February 2022 issue and all on ChemicalProcessing.com. Send visuals — a sketch is fine. E-mail us at [email protected] or mail to Process Puzzler, Chemical Processing, 1501 E. Woodfield Rd., Suite 400N, Schaumburg, IL 60173. Fax: (630) 467-1120. Please include your name, title, location and company affiliation in the response.
And, of course, if you have a process problem you’d like to pose to our readers, send it along and we’ll be pleased to consider it for publication.