Growing social pressure, expanding pay data laws and a global pandemic that is inflicting disproportionate economic damage on women and people of color are compelling organizations to confront workplace disparity; though new research indicates progress around the issue is largely inconsistent. A study from Harvard Business Review and the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) in association with Trusaic examines the actions businesses are taking to improve diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI); how successful they are; and where critical gaps remain. The research suggests two key factors are driving progress: commitment from the executive ranks and a commitment to better data.
The survey report identifies respondents as “leaders,” “followers” or “laggards” based on how they rated their organizations on DEI progress. It includes comments from senior HR executives at large organizations, including chemical manufacturer Albemarle.
While a majority of survey respondents (65%) say DEI is a high strategic priority, two thirds (67%) also admit their organization is, at best, only somewhat successful in its efforts to create a diverse, equitable and inclusive workplace. Even among leader organizations, almost half acknowledge they are behind where they should be in improving DEI. Most laggard organizations report DEI initiatives are more “style over substance.”
The findings reveal that momentum for change must begin in the C-suite:
● Half of laggard organizations say they are frustrated by a lack of commitment from leadership, and 72% say they are held back by a lack of diversity at senior levels of the organization.
● 77% of leader organizations have visible executive support compared to just 34% of laggards.
● When the CEO sets the strategy and frequently communicates DEI progress, the company is 6.3 times more likely to have a diverse leadership team and also to be a leader in its industry segment.
● DEI leaders are significantly more likely than followers or laggards to set goals for levels of diversity among senior executives and board members.
Measuring and tracking DEI metrics are essential to accelerating DEI progress, according to Trusaic. Leader organizations regularly monitor DEI metrics, communicate progress to key stakeholders and use data to identify interventions and course-correct:
● Leaders (70%) are more than twice as likely as laggards (30%) to track all three aspects of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Leaders also measure progress across a wider range of metrics.
● Recruiting and hiring are the most tracked diversity metrics. Leaders track both areas much more than laggards.
● Leaders work far harder to determine whether their staff are treated equitably and are significantly more likely to track equity in compensation, performance development and feedback, promotions, and access to growth opportunities.
● A third of laggard companies that track diversity do not track equity at all.
● 95% of DEI leaders measure inclusion goal progress at least annually; 51% track inclusion goal progress at least quarterly. This is more than twice as often as laggards.
● More than twice as many leaders have seen inclusion sentiment improvement in the past two years.
“Organizations that commit to correcting imbalances in the workplace are often met with significant challenges. What’s missing is the critical connection point between monitoring DEI metrics and using that data to improve the effectiveness of DEI programs to create lasting, meaningful change,” says Robert Sheen, CEO of Trusaic. “Data supports firms in holding themselves to account. Access to timely and reliable data is key to DEI success.”
Leader organizations’ DEI efforts pay diverse dividends, according to Trusaic. As a direct result of their DEI efforts, surveyed leaders reported greater improvements in team diversity, employee engagement, collaboration, pay equity and the ability to recruit top talent.
For more information, visit: www.trusaic.com
