Virtualization Provides Benefits To Process Automation

Virtualization is directly applicable to server-based CPAS functions

Virtualization Benefits in CPAS

Since virtualization today can only be applied to some parts of process automation systems, it can be difficult to assign specific economic value to the technology. Virtualization plays an important role wherever server hardware is used in the automation system. This is at levels 2 to 4 of the ISA-95 manufacturing model. Today’s automation suppliers offer system configurations that feature server consolidation. Multiple HMI machines and other application servers are replaced by virtual machines. A small number (usually one or two) of more powerful hosts support these virtual machines. Besides being more powerful, the new servers incorporate levels of redundancy with respect to power, storage, compute, and network resources.

Server consolidation benefits include removal of physical equipment, freeing rack or panel space in congested control areas. Power requirements and system administration burden are also reduced (though the remaining administration work is technically more complex).

The largest benefit to end users of server consolidation in process automation systems is the de-coupling of the automation software from specific configurations of PC or server hardware. For years, many HMI and other automation system functions have been implemented on PC hardware. Plant owner-operators and automation suppliers have struggled to support these systems due to the short lifecycle of PC products. By virtualizing such a system, it can be more easily supported once replacement hardware is no longer available. This higher degree of hardware independence helps extend automation system life and reduces production interruptions due to automation system upgrades.

At lower levels (1-2) in the ISA-95 model, automation functions are implemented in embedded systems (e.g., process controllers, process I/O equipment or field devices) that are managed by a real-time OS.

While these devices can be simulated or emulated, strictly speaking they cannot be virtualized as-is. Instead, their embedded software must be modified and/or ported to some degree to operate in a virtual machine environment. Most automation suppliers have developed products that now provide this functionality.

For the field devices and actuators at level 1 of the ISA-95 model, there is not much to report at present about virtualization. Simulation software/hardware is available for some field networks. Several technologies are becoming available (EDDL, FDT, FDI) for managing field device parameterization, configuration and diagnostics. However, the commissioning of field devices remains largely a field activity and has not yet benefited from virtualization or simulation to the same degree as other areas of process automation systems.

Virtualization separates IT functions from specific physical hardware

Virtualization Benefits for the Plant Asset Lifecycle

For process manufacturers, virtualization technology can bring significant value to their installed base of automation systems as well as to automation projects for new plants. For installed systems, the benefits come from replacing dedicated servers with virtual ones. In new installations, the benefits come from schedule compression resulting from the ability to develop the system configurations and applications in a virtualized environment. End users should evaluate specific benefits that accrue both during the design and build phase and the O&M phase of the plant asset lifecycle.

Benefits during the design and build phase center around two major areas. First is the reduced space and utility requirements of an automation system incorporating server virtualization. These reductions can be dramatic and result in substantial savings in high-cost installation areas such as offshore platforms. Note that to fully take advantage of such savings, these reduced requirements must be known during the early FEED stages of project engineering so that the project civil and mechanical engineering designs take advantage of the reduced system power and space requirements. Without a main automation contractor (MAC) structure, projects are not likely to realize these benefits.

Second is the ability to engineer the automation system without access to the target hardware. This leads to any number of changes in the configuration and engineering process, as automation supplier and project engineering teams work using a virtualized automation system for almost all their project engineering activities. These changes can include:

• Employing a geographically distributed project team working from different locations on the same virtualized automation system
• Reduced project dependencies between system hardware deliveries and system configuration and engineering deliverables
• Conducting a “VFAT,” a factory acceptance test for the automation system using a virtualized system
• Late binding of the system software and configuration with the target hardware
• Concurrent development of operator training simulators and automation system engineering

Virtualization benefits during the O&M lifecycle phase can also be significant. Reduced requirements for physical space and electric power can be valuable in space-constrained brownfield sites. The de-coupling of updates to system hardware and software is another important benefit. Simplified HMI and other server hardware may result in MTTR reductions. Virtualization should also enable end users to maintain development/test systems and OTS installations with less effort; though ARC believes the case for these benefits is not yet field proven. Finally, system administration, back-up and disaster recovery processes can be simplified and less disruptive, though they will be more complex technically.

Harry Forbes, Senior Automation Analyst, ARC Advisory Group, covers distributed control systems and industrial networking for ARC. He has 30 years of experience in automation, power generation, en-ergy management, modeling and simulation, advanced control, and optimization. Harry is a graduate of Tufts University with a BS in electrical engineering and also has an MBA from the Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan.